Establish what is true before prescribing change.
The current state is reconstructed from records, systems, process evidence, and focused testimony. A proposed solution does not get to define the problem.
Operating principles
The method is designed to reveal enough of the business to answer the question—without turning examination into occupation.
The current state is reconstructed from records, systems, process evidence, and focused testimony. A proposed solution does not get to define the problem.
Material findings state the condition, evidence, consequence, uncertainty, current control, and failure boundary.
Work, software, financial records, people, authority, and management judgment are examined as two corresponding fields—not assumed to be one system.
Sensitive records expose the interior of a business. Scope, custody, access, and privacy are operating controls—not footer decoration.
The work has a beginning, a defined examination, useful outputs, a decision, and closure. Good work should reduce the client’s need for continuing consultancy.
Efficiency without authority, review, exception handling, and visible failure states can make disorder faster and harder to see.
How work proceeds
Written brief, trigger, consequence, known evidence, and explicit exclusions.
Scope, access, records, interviews, time period, privacy controls, and evidence gaps.
Independent review of how work, information, financial representation, and decisions actually move.
Current-state maps and findings attached to evidence, consequence, uncertainty, and control.
One focused session to determine correction, containment, further evidence, or closure.
The anti-promise
A low-risk first step
A short written brief is enough to establish whether a bounded review may be useful.
Describe the situation